The Oshkosh Northwestern has an article about an Anti-Bullying Bill that is being considered by the state legislature for the third time and how with Democratic control is gaining support for passage this year.
My first thought was, why does the state have to approve an anti-bullying law? One would think that schools have some sort of rules that would cover this. After 5 months of study the conclusion of a committee to study this came up with this conclusion,
schools either follow state anti-bullying guidelines or come up with their own.
Really? After 5 months this was their conclusion? It took 5 months to come up with something that could have been stated in 5 minutes. It should be noted that according to the article a majority of the 426 school districts in Wisconsin don't have a bullying policy. What we don't find out is what a bullying policy is.
Luckily there's a link to
BullyPolice.org which gives us some answers. They sum it up this way,
The only differences between a terrorist and a bully, is in the organized planning or cause of the activity, and the scale of terror. A bullied child will believe that there is no difference between a terrorist and a bully, given the above definitions.If you need more info about bullies, go visit their site.
From what I can tell the Wisconsin bill is more about money than substance.
The committee wants to allow schools to exceed state-mandated revenue limits by up to $40,000 or $100 per student, whichever is greater, to cover school safety costs.
What isn't stated is if this a yearly or one time allowance. It seems that bully's reign supreme because of money constraints. I'm finding it difficult that schools don't have a policy that tries to control unruly behavior, I guess things have changed more than I thought since I went to school.
Besides the money issue the guidelines and possible law would also include a requirement that school districts hold two school safety drills a year and a loosening of privacy laws.
Under the change, schools would have to turn over student records to any law enforcement agency or district attorney investigating a student if they certify in writing that the records are for juvenile justice purposes and related to an ongoing investigation. They also would be required not to disclose the records to any other person. A school liaison officer, oftentimes a police officer assigned to work in a school, would also be given the same legal access to student records that teachers and administrators have.
This I'm sure is a legal fight waiting to happen especially since Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen supports it.
If one takes the money out of the formula, then this legislation is pointless as I again can't believe that any schools don't a policy to take the issue of student safety in place. Terrorism or not.